About

ACARMF, or ACARs for Morphological Freedom. Short for Anti Contact Anti Recoveries for Morphological Freedom.

• Anti contact: against romantic and sexual relations between chrono youth and those significantly older.
• Anti recovery: against “recovery” from paraphilic attractions. Out attractions are not illnesses or something we should “recover from.”
• Pro transid/transx and pro transitioning for non harmful transids. Transids like trace and transabled are not transharmful identities.

*ACARMF is against transharmful transitioning. NCRP (non consensual role play) and similar simulated actions do not count as full transitioning for transharmful identities.

Holocreep is a blankqueer stance. It’s meant for those who want to self express without catering either to antis or to abuse supporters.

It is pro:

• all attractions, all transids, all types of plurality, all MUDs;
• being unapologetically weird and offputting;
• fetishizing anything and everything and making weird art;
• uplifting abuse victims;
• contact discourse.

It is against:

• assimilationism and making a good impression on antis;
• “pro everything” stances;
• softening language around CSEM;
• terms “narc abuse”, “harmful para”, “pro recovery”.

Nopequeer (emoji code 🌼✖️) is a label that’s mainly about voicing disagreement, protecting your boundaries, fighting for what’s right, and leaving situations/groups that end up shitty.

It is pro:

• speaking up when something feels off;
• asking mood killer questions like “why do you call yourself a cisgroomer” or “why are people saying you’re dating a 13 yo”;
• being the main cringe killjoy of your group, if there’s no other way;
• knowing where is the line you shouldn’t cross;
• just fucking leaving if it gets too bad.

It is against:

• being cool and based;
• shaming and mocking people into group conformity;
• allowing others to dull your anti abuse radar;
• abandoning care for others’ wellbeing and safety for the sake of scaring antis with how bad you are.

Radeviance is a new political and philosophical concept. It is an attempt to explore the meaning and the potential of deviance – deviant identities (orientations, including gender-based and paraphiliac ones, genders, neurodivergences, and more) and deviant presentation, which is very likely but not inherently a means of expressing an identity.

The approximate purposes:

• To let deviant individuals explore their identities both separately and in an interconnected manner. Nobody should be forced to choose whether they participate in a community for one part of their life or for another, nobody should be harassed for finding parallels or causation between their identities, e.g. drawing some links between being otherkin and being transgender.
• To de-purify those deviant identities that were given a "protected status" by exclusionist communities and are considered above being compared or mixed with something else.
• To disconnect being disordered, perceiving one’s experience as hurtful, from the concepts of treatment and elimination. Those with identities caused by illnesses and trauma are equally allowed to celebrate and be proud.
• Similar to the above, to lift the stigma around identities, understood through sex or pornography.
• To stop the process of fragmenting and exclusionism, to prevent groups that may gain more social acceptance in the future from aligning with the majority and using their increased visibility for hurting the less lucky ones.

The basics:

• A norm in the social sense is a system that assigns value to traits and to those who possess these traits writes and distributes roles, and punishes for deviating from these roles.
• A deviant is someone who does not have traits that are considered valuable from the point of view of the norm, who feels or presents in a way that is rejected by their environment.
• The principles by which something is considered normal or deviant do not correspond with humane ethics, even if some currently stigmatized acts are objectively bad.
• Not all oppression targets deviance, but non-deviant marginalized groups may still be affected by anti-deviant oppression, because no marginalized group is immune from oppression that is primarily designed for some other group.
• Some deviant groups or individuals may be accepted conditionally if they agree to self-policing and participate in attacks on other deviants. This is not true acceptance and does not make them safe.
• The only way to create a better world is to deconstruct the norm.